Unit
9
THE
RESEARCH PROCESS
Task 1. Read and learn the
words and word combinations.
|
to
advance v. to
anticipate v. apparent
a. aptitude
n. argue in favor of available
a. to
clarify v. consistent
a. to
contradict v. controversy n convincing
a. to
elaborate v. to
find out v. forceful
a. to
inquire into v. to
lay out v. messy
a. to
neglect v. point of departure parsing
n. plausible
a. puzzle
n. to
propound v. to
reflect v. to
refute v. to
reject v. review
v. scope
n. to
set v. to
specify v. to
spring up v. straightforward a. |
âèñîâóâàòè,
âíîñèòè, ðóõàòè
âïåðåä ïåðåäáà÷àòè î÷åâèäíèé, âèäèìûé, éìîâ³ðíèé çäàòí³ñòü, ñõèëüí³ñòü äî ÷îãî-í. ïðèâîäèòè
äîâîäè íà êîðèñòü äîñòóïíèé, ùî º ó íàÿâíîñò³ ç’ÿñóâàòè, âèÿâèòè ñóì³ñíèé, óçãîäæåíèé çàïåðå÷óâàòè, ïðîòèñòàâëÿòè ðîçá³æí³ñòü ïåðåêîíëèâèé ðîçðîáëÿòè, ðîçâèâàòè ç’ÿñóâàòè, ðîçâ³äàòè, ä³éòè äî ³ñòèíè ñèëüíèé,
âïëèâîâèé äîñë³äæóâàòè,
ç’ÿñîâóâàòè ïëàíóâàòè, ðîçáèâàòè, âèñòàâëÿòè áåçëàäíèé çàïåðå÷óâàòè, íåõòóâàòè â³äïðàâíà òî÷êà àíàë³ç, ãðàìàòè÷íèé
ðîçá³ð ïðàâäîïîä³áíèé, ïðèéíÿòíèé, éìîâ³ðíèé ïèòàííÿ, ùî
ñïàíòåëè÷óº; çàãàäêà, ïðîáëåìà âèíîñèòè íà
îáãîâîðåííÿ â³äîáðàæàòè,
â³äáèâàòè çàïåðå÷óâàòè, äîâîäèòè õèáí³ñòü â³äêèäàòè, â³äõèëÿòè ðîáèòè îãëÿä, ðåöåíçóâàòè, ïåðåãëÿäàòè ìåæ³ 䳿, ðàìêè âñòàíîâëþâàòè òî÷íî âèçíà÷àòè, âñòàíîâëþâàòè, óòî÷íþâàòè âèíèêàòè, ç’ÿâëÿòèñü ïðÿìèé, áåçïîñåðåäí³é |
Task 2. Make up sentences with the words given in task 1.
Task 3.
Read the text and discuss it. Write a
synopsis of the text in five sentences.
Most research textbooks represent research as a
multi-stage process that you must follow in order to undertake and complete
your research project. The precise number of stages varies, but they usually
include formulating and clarifying a topic, critically reviewing the
literature, choosing a strategy, collecting data, analyzing data and writing
up. You may suggest that the research process is rational and straightforward. Unfortunately this is very rarely true, and the reality is
considerably messier. While research is often depicted
as moving through each of the stages outlined below, one after the other, this
is unlikely to be the case. In reality you will
probably revisit each stage more than once. Each time you revisit a stage you
will need to reflect on the associated issues and refine your ideas.
Research is sometimes
described using the hourglass model. The hourglass model starts with a
broad spectrum for research, focusing in on the required information through
the methodology of the project (like the neck of the hourglass), then expands
the research in the form of discussion and results.
The whole process of research can be divided into the following steps:
setting general area of research; defining
the object of research; analyzing problem situation and stating a problem;
specifying the subject of research; formulating a research goal; setting
objectives; moving a hypothesis; developing research methods; collecting,
describing, processing, interpreting research data; drawing conclusions,
proving a hypothesis and resolving a research puzzle; determining application
areas; writing research project.
Any research starts with setting a research area which is determined by a number of objective and
subjective factors. The objective determinants are such as topicality, novelty,
urgency of the research. The subjective factors include scientific and
professional interests of a researcher, his expertise, aptitudes, frame of
mind, etc.
The object of the research is always broader than
the subject chosen for research. It is a system of relations and
properties of the phenomenon which exists objectively
in theory and in practice and serves as a source of relevant information. The
subject of the research is more concrete and includes only those relations
and properties which are subject to direct
investigation. It denotes what the author is planning to create in the process
of studies.
A research problem is a puzzle that can’t be explained with available knowledge and needs
solution.
In the introduction to the research paper
it is necessary to prove that the chosen problem is topical. A problem is
topical if it meets at least three requirements:
the problem has not been fully studied;
much or something in the problem remains vague;
lack of knowledge on the problem makes a loss to
community.
To prove that the problem chosen for the
research is topical the author gives a review of the previously published
papers on the topic and a list of authors who were active in the studies of the
problem. Then he/she mentions that though the problem has
been given considerable attention, still something is not known and
makes concrete what is still unknown on the topic. One also mentions what is
still vague and needs elaboration. Then the author describes difficulties that
spring up because the problem of his/her research has not
been fully studied.
There is usually one major goal of research with
objectives. The wish of the author to study a problem is expressed usually in
one sentence which says that the goal of the research
is to study the defined topic. Concrete objectives are
further specified. The tasks of the research are usually the
following:
to clarify the nature and structure of the phenomenon
being researched;
to analyze the approaches to the research topic in
literature;
to describe aspects of the research topic by
observation;
to generate a model;
to carry out an experiment;
to analyze experimental results;
to find out the ways of improving efficiency of the
phenomenon under research.
The tasks (objectives) of research are set
in order to plan the steps of the research. They may correspond to the order of
the units and chapters of the research paper as a whole.
A hypothesis is a tentative assumption that proposes a possible
explanation to some phenomenon or event. A hypothesis is said
to be forceful if the assumption is not obvious from the very beginning of the
research and really needs to be well proved. Researchers weighing up
alternative hypotheses should take into consideration:
testability;
simplicity;
scope - the apparent application of the hypothesis to
multiple cases of phenomena;
fruitfulness - the prospect that a hypothesis may
explain further phenomena in the future;
conservatism - the degree of "fit" with
existing recognized knowledge-systems.
Hypotheses can be logical (arising from
literature review), descriptive (predicting certain features in a phenomenon)
and explanatory (anticipating plausible explanation of a puzzle).
Generally a hypothesis is used to make predictions
that can be tested by observing the outcome of an experiment. If the outcome is
inconsistent with the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is
rejected. However, if the outcome is consistent with the hypothesis, the
experiment is said to support the hypothesis.
How are hypotheses formulated?
Bacterial growth may be
affected by temperature.
Ultra violet light may cause skin cancer.
Temperature may cause leaves to change
color.
All of these are examples of hypotheses because
they use the tentative word “may”. However, their form is not quite correct.
Using the word “may” does not suggest how you would go about proving it. If
these statements had not been written carefully, they
may not have even been hypotheses at all. For example, if we say
“Trees will change color when it gets cold” we are making a prediction. Or if we write "Ultraviolet light causes skin
cancer", we make a conclusion. One way to prevent making such easy
mistakes is to formalize the form of the hypothesis.
Formalized
hypothesis examples:
If
leaf color change is related
to temperature, then exposing plants to low temperatures
will result in changes in
leaf color.
If
skin cancer is related to
ultraviolet light,
then people with a high
exposure to uv light will
have a higher frequency of skin
cancer.
Notice that these statements contain the
words, if and then. They are necessary in a formalized hypothesis. Formalized
hypotheses contain two variables. One is "independent" and the other
is "dependent." The independent variable is the one the scientist
controls and the dependent variable is the one the scientist observes and/or
measures. In the statements above the dependent
variable is printed in italics and the independent variable is underlined. The
ultimate value of a formalized hypothesis is that it forces us to think about
what results we should look for in an experiment.
The conclusions are the results of research findings. Usually the
conclusions follow the order:
- conclusion on whether the
research goal has been achieved;
- conclusion on whether the
hypothesis has been proved or not;
- conclusion on whether each
research task has been fulfilled;
- conclusions on what has
been found in fulfilling every research task;
- conclusion on additional
findings during the research;
- conclusion on further
prospects to continue the research.
Evaluation of the research paper is done out of 100 %.
Each item of evaluation is assessed out of 10 %. In all there are 10 items of evaluation:
- innovative subject;
- forceful hypothesis;
- concrete research goal;
- clear research tasks;
- adequate methods of
research;
- detailed presentation of
data;
- convincing interpretation;
- well
grounded novel conclusions;
- complete bibliography list;
- perfect format.
If your research paper scores less than 65
% it is “non-pass” and will have to be improved. A satisfactory result is up to
80 %. Between 80 % and 95 % is a good grade. An excellent result is 95 % and
over.
Task 4. Restore the logical order of the stages of research:
1. studying known facts about
the object of research;
2. formulating and clarifying
a topic;
3. defining the object of
research;
4. choosing adequate methods;
5. moving a hypothesis;
6. setting objectives;
7. collecting experimental
data;
8. stating a problem;
9. explaining the results
obtained;
10. determining application
areas;
11. quantitative and
qualitative processing of data.
Task 5. Complete the sentences according to the text above.
1. Research as a multi-stage process that ____
2. General research area is determined by ____
3. The object of the research is ____
4. The subject of the research denotes what ____.
5. A research problem may be defined as ____
6. A problem is topical if ____.
7. A hypothesis is a tentative assumption that ____.
8. Hypotheses should meet the requirements of ____
9. Hypotheses are of three types, namely ____
10. The hypothesis is rejected if ____
11. Formalized hypotheses include ____
12. The conclusions of research follow the order ____.
13. If you want to be proud of your research, it
should meet the following parameters:
____ subject;
____ hypothesis;
____ research goal;
____ research tasks;
____ methods of
research;
____ presentation of
data;
____ interpretation;
____ novel
conclusions;
____ bibliography
list;
____ format.
Task 6. The logic of all experimental researches is basically the same, regardless of the field of study in
which the scientist is working. The information presented in the table below is
from the field of teaching foreign languages. Match the formulations in column
A with basic stages of research in column B.
|
A |
B |
|
1) the model of
teaching students to writing expository essays |
a) general area of study |
|
2) to elaborate the methodology of
teaching writing expository essays and verify its effectiveness
experimentally |
b) object
of research |
|
3) literature review,
observation, teaching experiment |
c) research
problem |
|
A |
B |
|
4) teaching English as
a foreign language |
d) subject
of research |
|
5) contradiction
between students’ need in mastering academic writing and lack of model
teaching it |
e) research
purpose |
|
6) to define the
properties and rhetorical organization of expository essays; to study productive,
reproductive and socio-cultural aspects of academic writing; to consider
existing approaches to teaching writing |
f) research
objectives |
|
7) the process of
teaching students to academic writing |
g) hypothesis |
|
8) teaching students to
writing expository essays will be more effective if it is organized by
modelling basic characteristics of academic discourse thought of as an
activity and as a product |
h) methods |
Task 7. Find Ukrainian equivalents of the English
words used in the text about research process.
|
1) precise a. |
à) íàãàëüíà ïîòðåáà |
|
2) clarify v. |
b) áåçëàäíèé, áðóäíèé |
|
3) review v. |
ñ) î÷èùàòè, ðàô³íóâàòè, âäîñêîíàëþâàòè |
|
4) straightforward
a. |
d) äîñâ³ä, êâàë³ô³êàö³ÿ, ìàéñòåðí³ñòü |
|
5) messy a. |
å) ïîâ’ÿçàíèé, ñóïóòí³é |
|
6) depict v. |
f) ïðîëèòè ñâ³òëî íà, ç’ÿñóâàòè |
|
7) outline v. |
g) îêðåñëèòè, çîáðàçèòè â çàãàëüíèõ
ðèñàõ |
|
8) reflect on v. |
h) íåÿñíèé, íåâèçíà÷åíèé, íå÷³òêèé |
|
9) associated a. |
i) îïèñóâàòè, çîáðàæóâàòè, ìàëþâàòè |
|
10) tentative a. |
j) ïðÿìèé, ïðîñòèé |
|
11) refine v. |
k) ðåöåíçóâàòè, ïåðåãëÿäàòè |
|
12) specify v. |
1) ïðàâäîïîä³áíèé, ïðèéíÿòíèé |
|
13) anticipate v. |
m) òî÷íî âèçíà÷àòè, âñòàíîâëþâàòè, óòî÷íþâàòè |
|
14) hourglass n. |
n) çäàòí³ñòü, ñõèëüí³ñòü äî ÷îãî-í. |
|
15) urgency n. |
î) ðîçðîáëÿòè, îáì³ðêîâóâàòè |
|
16) expertise n. |
ð) ùî ï³äëÿãຠ|
|
17) aptitude n. |
q) ïåðåäáà÷àòè |
|
18) vague a. |
r) ðîçäóìóâàòè, ðîçì³ðêîâóâàòè |
|
19) elaborate v. |
s) ïîïåðåäí³é |
|
20) subject to a. |
u) òî÷íèé |
|
21) plausible a. |
v) ï³ñî÷íèé ãîäèííèê |
Task 8. Look through paragraph 1 of the text again
and find the words which mean the same.
1.
to explain something in an exact and detailed way
2.
an idea that attempts to explain something but has not
yet been tested or proved to be correct
3.
not complicated or difficult to understand
4.
a subject that people discuss or argue about,
especially relating to society, politics etc.
5.
complicated, difficult, and unpleasant to deal with
6.
based on sensible practical reasons rather than
emotions
7.
to think about something carefully and seriously
8.
to consider or discuss something again
9.
to be connected with something in some way
10.
a glass container that uses sand to measure one hour
Task 9. Complete the sentences with the words
above.
1.
2. There didn't seem to be any ____ explanation for
his actions.
3. To make a claim, you must ____ the date when the
article was lost.
4. Josie ____ how easily she could have been killed.
5. It's a fairly ____ operation.
6. His social problems were ____ with heavy drinking.
7. I think that's a subject which will have to be ____
.
8. It's a website devoted to environmental ____ .
9. A symbol of ____ is used in computer programs to
show that the program is busy and you should wait.
10. Politics has always been a ____ business.
Task 10. Translate the following sentences into
Ukrainian paying attention to the use of the words in bold type.
1. It would take too long to present here even a small
number of the arguments which have been propounded both in favor of and against the
hypothesis.
2. Our experiments were conducted as part of the
3. Our analysis will be rather informal, but it will be
elaborated in more detail than has been practicable so far.
4. The new data may not clarify variations in the
anatomical evolution of different groups of prehistoric populations.
5. The use of biological molecules in such reactions
constitutes a promising approach to nanophase
engineering.
6. Inadequate information allows two types of errors: accepting
a hypothesis as true when it is false, and rejecting a
hypothesis as false when it is in fact true.
7. Many of our observations can be objectively confirmed
by informant tests.
8. The purpose of this book is to argue in favor of a fresh
paradigm.
9. The book’s approach is consistent with both its point
of departure and its aims.
10. Having laid out the basic scheme, I should
now ideally specify in grater detail what goes
into each of components which make up my parsing model.
Task 11. Analyze the following word combinations
and use them to make sentences of your own.
|
the chief / general the central / key the main / particular the major / primary |
aim goal purpose task |
of this study / research / paper |
is to |
investigate / establish / compare / examine /
outline / explain / describe propose / specify / discuss / demonstrate |
|
the present |
paper / investigation |
focuses on / deals with / is devoted to the
problems of / provides insight into
/ presents a new
approach to / proposes a new
framework / inquires into / is aimed at / attempts to explain the mechanism of |
|
advance formulate put forward accept check / test verify contradict reject prove |
|
|
a hypothesis |
Task 12. Answer the questions.
1. What stages does the
research process include?
2. What factors
determine the choice of research area?
3. What is the object of
research?
4. What does the subject
of research denote?
5. What is meant by a
research problem?
6. What problem is
considered to be topical?
7. What is a research
hypothesis?
8. What requirements
should hypotheses meet?
9. What do the three
types of hypotheses differ in?
10. When is the
hypothesis rejected?
11. What do formalized
hypotheses include?
12. What order do the
conclusions of research follow?
13. What are items of
evaluation of a research project?
Task
13.
Speak on the following problems and
discuss them with your colleagues:
a)
the stages you will need to complete as part of your research process;
b)
the correlation between the object and the subject, the goal and the objectives
of research;
c)
analyse the concept of a research hypothesis;
d)
formulate basic stages of your research;
e) prove that your problem is topical.
Lexical revision. Commonly misused
words. Translate the sentences. Choose the correct usage with the help of a
dictionary if necessary.
1. James is continuously/continually late.
The river runs continuously
/continually through several towns.
2.
Our neighbor has just been elected to
the town council /counsel. Two troubled men sought his friend's council
/counsel.
3.
Because the defendant had a good alibi,
his story seemed creditable/ credulous /credible. As a result of
many hours of hard work, you presented a creditable/credulous/credible report.
4.
His unusual recipe called for current
/currant jelly. Because the current /currant was swift,
the canoe was difficult to maneuver.
5.
The desert/dessert is very
hot and dry. More and more young soldiers have been deserting /desserting the army. Apple pie is